In Western culture, there was
Cinderella, whose glass slipper was so small that only she could fit into it. In
his search for Cinderella, Prince Charming had girls from all over the kingdom
try on the glass slipper that Cinderella left behind. Because of the slipper’s
small size, it’s said that girls would cut portions of their foot so that it
could fit into the slipper, trying to prove to Prince Charming that they were
the one. Having said that, this is only a fairytale; there is no known evidence
that girls amputated part of their foot to fit into the glass slipper. However,
it is well known that in the past, in Chinese culture, parents would bind their
daughter’s foot to keep it a small size.
When the topic of foot binding is brought
up, one question always comes to mind: Where is the attractiveness in small
feet? At a young age, girls are put through the pain of having their foot bound
to prevent its growth. Toes are bent, foot becomes disfigured, and in many
occasions, due to the breaking of the bones, the foot starts to rot. In today’s
society, it is hard to comprehend why any individual would go through such a painful
measure to appear ‘attractive.’ When asked to use a word to describe foot
binding, people’s replies were solely of negative adjectives – disgusting, gross, and painful. I
believe, it is indeed all of those. The shape of the foot disgusts a lot of
people, the rotting is gross, and the breaking of the bones is extremely
painful, but this is a contemporary view attributed to the Western world.
Foot binding in ancient China is a
body modification act that is linked to its historical context. In order to
understand why this alteration of the foot was so popular in the olden days, it
requires a deeper analysis of what was going on during that era of China. Parents
nurtured sons to be warriors or scholars while daughters were raised to be
someone’s wife. Females’ responsibilities were to become child bearers and to
look beautiful in important events, much like what is now a day considered to
be ‘trophy wives.’ Foot binding is similar to a show of status. Having their
foot bound meant that they are unable to work; the girls would have to be
supported by their family until they get married. Families that had the means
to do so would signify that they were well off and that their daughter would be
highly educated and worthy of marrying into prestigious family, which is what
every girl strived for back in ancient China. It appears that the girls were
very shallow for only considering husbands with money, but back then marriages
were mostly arranged by parents and the more prestigious the family the more
the parents would want their daughter to marry into it. The only way to do so was
if the girl was highly educated, well mannered, and graceful (determined by
posture and movement, which is where the bound feet came in, because small feet
resulted in more sway of the hips). If the female did not possess small feet,
it was hard for her to find a mate, which caused a burden on the family since the
parents would have to feed her and provide other necessities.
Foot binding is a grotesque act that
should not be practiced but it’s important to understand why it was so
widespread in ancient China. In the perspective of a westerner, it’s easy to
comprehend why this body modification measure yields so much negativity but
because it is from another culture, it is wrong to simply discard it. As
presented by anthropologists, we should possess cultural relativism – principle
stating that we should understand individuals’ beliefs and activities in terms
of the individual’s own culture. Putting forth the reason why girls at a young
age would be willing to bind their foot is not saying that we need to accept it
but implying that we should at least comprehend why it was done.
I like that you brought up Cinderella! Some scholars think that, in the original French oral tradition, 'glass slipper' (Fr: 'pantoufle de verre') might have been 'fur slipper' (Fr: 'pantoufle de vair') since the words 'glass' and 'fur' are homonyms in French. I wonder how the storyline would have been different if this were the case (as in, I don't think you'd slice your feet on a fur slipper as much as a glass slipper).
ReplyDeleteOh I had no idea that it might have been fur slipper....interesting to know!
DeleteSU, interesting point r.e. the glass slipper. I did not know this either.
ReplyDelete